From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: cavokz@gmail.com (Domenico Andreoli)
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:18:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] ARM: Broadcom: Unconditionally build
 arch/arm/mach-bcm
In-Reply-To: <201307271638.16289.arnd@arndb.de>
References: <20130726145639.116237136@gmail.com>
 <20130726231108.GA10812@obsidianresearch.com>
 <20130726234237.GB24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <201307271638.16289.arnd@arndb.de>
Message-ID: <20130801141858.GB1904@glitch>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 04:38:16PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 27 July 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 05:11:08PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:59:00PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, there's a simpler solutions to this:
> > 
> > machdirs := $(patsubst %,arch/arm/mach-%/,$(sort $(machine-y)))
> > platdirs := $(patsubst %,arch/arm/plat-%/,$(Sort $(plat-y)))
> > 
> > which will remove all duplicates.
> 
> This does sound like the easiest solution, although I still think
> Olof's suggestion of making ARCH_BCM a silent Kconfig symbol would be
> just as good if we just have this one instance.

I know that time is always tight and there is also this DT ABI discussion
ongoing but do I have any chance to get any ack on this series?

Should I post a new set? It would be only to fix again the build of mach-bcm,
I've nothing else pending.

Thanks,
Domenico