From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: david@gibson.dropbear.id.au (David Gibson) Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 13:50:27 +1000 Subject: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?] In-Reply-To: References: <20130725175702.GC22291@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <1999586.84BnWE5EUh@thinkpad> <20130731191209.GA8027@netboy> <1409617.9untvfnOTJ@flatron> <20130731200017.GC8027@netboy> <20130731201457.GA24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130731204817.GC24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20130802035027.GA19115@voom.redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 05:26:47PM -0400, jonsmirl at gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:37:36PM -0400, jonsmirl at gmail.com > wrote: [snip] > Alternatively you may be of the belief that it is impossible to get > rid of the board specific code. But x86 doesn't have any of it, why > should ARM? Sure x86 has board specific code. It's just that x86 basically only has one board - PC. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: