[PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs

[mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette)]

Quoting Vikas Sajjan (2013-07-30 06:13:04)
> Hi Mike,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Quoting Vikas Sajjan (2013-07-21 23:15:27)
> >> Hi Kukjin / Mike,
> >>
> >> Can you apply this series
> >
> > Let me apply this to see if the dependencies are taken care of now. If
> > so I'll just take it through the clk tree.
> >
> 
> Any updates on this series.
> I could NOT see them at
> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/mturquette/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/clk-next

You should see it now.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> 
> > Regards,
> > Mike
> >
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Yadwinder Singh Brar
> >> <yadi.brar01@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi Kukjin / Mike,
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> >> >> Mike Turquette wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-06-24 08:02:39)
> >> >>> > On 06/22/13 01:31, Mike Turquette wrote:
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > Or I can take this through the clk tree. Either way is fine.
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > Mike, please go ahead taking this series into the clk tree for 3.11.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Actually it might be better for you to take it. Patch #5 relies on
> >> >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c which only exists in the samsung
> >> >>> tree.  It was introduced by commit 1609027f, "clk: exynos5420: register
> >> >>> clocks using common clock framework".
> >> >>>
> >> >> Yes, you're right. It depends on soc-exynos5420 stuff in samsung tree.
> >> >>
> >> >>> And these patches need to be applied with some fuzz to the clk tree due
> >> >>> to other changes which are not in my tree and only present in yours.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The best two options are either for you to take this series or it can be
> >> >>> rebased on top of clk-next, after which I'll apply it.
> >> >>>
> >> >> Let me try to send this series via samsung tree for v3.11 but I'm not sure because it's a little bit late for arm-soc tree.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks for your ack, just note I will send to arm-soc tonight in my time.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Can we get this series merge now in any of trees.
> >> > Please let me if its required to rebase it.
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Yadwinder