From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette) Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 14:35:16 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/6] clk: samsung: move common plls registration into separate function In-Reply-To: <201307111052.13618.heiko@sntech.de> References: <201307100057.06061.heiko@sntech.de> <1874409.iWz7oWBuYA@thinkpad> <201307111052.13618.heiko@sntech.de> Message-ID: <20130802213516.6450.7848@quantum> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Quoting Heiko St?bner (2013-07-11 01:52:13) > Am Donnerstag, 11. Juli 2013, 09:46:53 schrieb Tomasz Figa: > > Hi, > > > > On Wednesday 10 of July 2013 22:29:13 Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote: > > > Hi Heiko, > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Heiko St?bner wrote: > > > > All Samsung PLLs use similar code to register the clocks and clkdev > > > > lookups. Therefore move these into a separate function to reduce code > > > > duplication. > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Russell King > > > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner > > > > --- > > > > > > I have posted patch for adding common pll registration function > > > which some how missed to get merged. I hope will get merged after rc1. > > > Please give a look at that : > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org/msg19543.ht > > > ml > > > > Yeah, I was going to post a link to it, but I couldn't find it on any > > mailing list archive. I think we should go with the way of registration > > introduced by Yadwinder. > > the linked patch looks nice, thanks for the link. So I'll redo the plls > against it in the next round. I just took that series into clk-next, so you can base v2 of this series against clk-next. Regards, Mike > > > Heiko