From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thierry.reding@gmail.com (Thierry Reding) Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 08:59:56 +0200 Subject: [PATCHv6 00/13] MSI support for Marvell EBU PCIe driver In-Reply-To: <20130806200256.GB19280@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1375363516-2620-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20130806200256.GB19280@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <20130807065954.GA22906@manwe> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 04:02:56PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > Thomas, > > In order to get some testing in -next, I've *tentatively* applied this > series in the following way: > > +---+ mvebu/msi_common (1,2,3,10) > | > +---+---+ mvebu/msi_irq (4-9) > | > +---+---+ mvebu/msi_mvebu (11-13) > > I had to make one change to patch #9, I protected the last two blocks > with #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI to prevent a build failure at that point. > > mvebu/msi_common should be appropriate for Thierry to base off, however, > I make no guarantees about the stability of the branch until I send a > PR for it. Code-wise, it should be fine, but the commit-ids may change > due to adding Tested-by's, etc. I noticed that patch 10 has my Reviewed-by, even though my comments weren't addressed. They were about stylistic issues but I'd still like to see them fixed now rather than having to fix them up later. Also I think I gave my Tested-by on those patches somewhere already and I think it's unlikely that anybody else will test them, so with the consistency style fixes applied I don't see any reason why that branch can't be stabilized right away. Thierry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: