From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 21:16:40 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Add spinlocks In-Reply-To: References: <1375612728-20501-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1375612728-20501-3-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20130807191640.GG2911@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Linus, On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 08:42:42PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > > The current code use no locking at all, which is obviously not that > > great and can lead to concurrency issues, especially with the newer SMP > > SoCs from Allwinner. > > > > Add some locking where it's needed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard > > This does not apply to my fixes branch which is based off > v3.11-rc4. I think you're missing this patch that I sent previously: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-July/186342.html > It is also too big to go into fixes. > > I think it may be requiring the other queued Allwinner things, > so it is better if I apply this on the devel branch after looking over > that Allwinner A20/A31 stuff? The A20/A31 stuff shouldn't conflict with this one, but yes, I you prefer to do it that way, it's fine for me. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: