From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:33:46 +0100
Subject: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+
In-Reply-To: <20130812230408.GA4420@roeck-us.net>
References: <52082EF8.10005@roeck-us.net>
 <CAFEAcA94ygwRPSsfxs3DvOcTZbdafLiEHys94FG4aXUx+A1t=A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130812164548.GE23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <CAFEAcA97PuORg920f-A_8rvCgBq=k5Y=0W6m2Nv8nnzjY19Utg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130812200628.GG23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <CAFEAcA9BA7zfaO1J5zVaEcG-AgOo6dyiew08-o2eObuBe-KWig@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130812212149.GH23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <CAFEAcA_0kzS=Z5oTxrr=B74wjf1x=M6dXwH7Fcgf77Pca90Gjw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130812221250.GI23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <20130812230408.GA4420@roeck-us.net>
Message-ID: <20130814103346.GN23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:04:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hacked diff is below. Can I write that up as clean patch and submit it,
> or do we need a test on real hardware ?

Well, if we want to ensure that it is really correct, the sensible thing
to do is to try it on real hardware, otherwise we're risking yet another
change to this.

Earlier in this thread, some people said that they have the hardware, so
it shouldn't be that difficult to get it tested on real stuff.