From: cavokz@gmail.com (Domenico Andreoli)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: bcm4760: Add system timer
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:32:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130815063234.GA23217@glitch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130815003038.GB27999@codeaurora.org>
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 05:30:38PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/15, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > +
> > +static inline void __iomem *to_load(struct bcm4760_timer *timer)
> > +{
> > + return timer->base + TIMER_LOAD_OFFSET;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void __iomem *to_control(struct bcm4760_timer *timer)
> > +{
> > + return timer->base + TIMER_CONTROL_OFFSET;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void __iomem *to_intclr(struct bcm4760_timer *timer)
> > +{
> > + return timer->base + TIMER_INTCLR_OFFSET;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void __iomem *to_ris(struct bcm4760_timer *timer)
> > +{
> > + return timer->base + TIMER_RIS_OFFSET;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void __iomem *to_mis(struct bcm4760_timer *timer)
> > +{
> > + return timer->base + TIMER_MIS_OFFSET;
> > +}
>
> Style Nit: This is new. Usually people either make a
> <my_driver>_{readl,writel}() function that takes the struct and
> an offset or they just add the offset directly in their
> readl/writel calls. Can you do that? Probably save some lines of
> code.
yes, sure.
>
> > +static irqreturn_t bcm4760_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > +{
> > + struct bcm4760_timer *timer = dev_id;
> > + void (*event_handler)(struct clock_event_device *);
> > +
> > + /* check the (masked) interrupt status */
> > + if (!readl_relaxed(to_mis(timer)))
> > + return IRQ_NONE;
> > +
> > + /* clear the timer interrupt */
> > + writel_relaxed(1, to_intclr(timer));
> > +
> > + event_handler = ACCESS_ONCE(timer->evt.event_handler);
> > + if (event_handler)
> > + event_handler(&timer->evt);
>
> This is unfortunate. Do you have a pending timer interrupt left
> by the bootloader?
Do you mean that if no interrupts are expected beween the irq request and
the call clockevents_config_and_register(), I can assume event_handler is
always set?
>
> > +
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __init bcm4760_init_time(struct device_node *node)
> > +{
> > + void __iomem *base;
> > + u32 freq = 24000000;
>
> Why have freq in the DT binding at all then?
To get an HW address and remap it at runtime, I guess. I copied it but
would also prefer to use DT only where really needed.
>
> > + int irq;
> > + struct bcm4760_timer *timer;
> > +
> > + base = of_iomap(node, 0);
> > + if (!base)
> > + panic("Can't remap timer registers");
> > +
> > + timer = kzalloc(sizeof(*timer), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!timer)
> > + panic("Can't allocate timer struct\n");
> > +
> > + irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> > + if (irq <= 0)
> > + panic("Can't parse timer IRQ");
> > +
> > + timer->base = base;
> > + timer->evt.name = node->name;
> > + timer->evt.rating = 300;
> > + timer->evt.features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT;
> > + timer->evt.set_mode = bcm4760_timer_set_mode;
> > + timer->evt.set_next_event = bcm4760_timer_set_next_event;
> > + timer->evt.cpumask = cpumask_of(0);
> > + timer->act.name = node->name;
> > + timer->act.flags = IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_SHARED;
> > + timer->act.dev_id = timer;
> > + timer->act.handler = bcm4760_timer_interrupt;
> > +
> > + if (setup_irq(irq, &timer->act))
> > + panic("Can't set up timer IRQ\n");
> > +
> > + clockevents_config_and_register(&timer->evt, freq, 0xf, 0xffffffff);
>
> If you switch this registration and the setup_irq() call you
> shouldn't need the ACCESS_ONCE() and that check in the irq handler.
> Please switch the order and or clear the interrupt before
> registering the clockevent and remove the checks in the interrupt
> handler.
got it. Thank you.
Domenico
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-15 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-14 22:10 [PATCH v3 0/5] ARM: Broadcom BCM4760 support Domenico Andreoli
2013-08-14 22:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] ARM: remove duplicates in mach-* and plat-* Domenico Andreoli
2013-08-14 22:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] ARM: bcm4760: Add platform infrastructure Domenico Andreoli
2013-08-15 13:28 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-29 23:17 ` Olof Johansson
2013-08-30 7:53 ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-08-30 21:52 ` Christian Daudt
2013-08-30 21:58 ` Olof Johansson
2013-09-10 16:16 ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-09-13 23:16 ` Christian Daudt
2013-08-14 22:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: bcm4760: Add system timer Domenico Andreoli
2013-08-15 0:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-08-15 6:32 ` Domenico Andreoli [this message]
2013-08-29 23:20 ` Olof Johansson
2013-08-29 23:21 ` Olof Johansson
2013-08-30 7:54 ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-08-14 22:10 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] ARM: bcm4760: Add ripple counter Domenico Andreoli
2013-08-14 22:10 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] ARM: bcm4760: Add restart hook Domenico Andreoli
2013-08-29 23:36 ` Olof Johansson
2013-08-30 8:01 ` Domenico Andreoli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130815063234.GA23217@glitch \
--to=cavokz@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).