答复: [PATCH v3 2/2] i2c: imx: Add Vybrid VF610 I2C controller support

[wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang)]

> I vote for having the exact SoC revision in the binding documentation
> rather than wildcards or references to the list of i.MX SoCs. Otherwise
> only the driver code gives a clue that the i2c driver matches imx1-i2c,
> imx21-i2c and vf610-i2c, but not imx31-i2c.

Dunno if I got all right, so adding my 2 cents:

Yes to adding each SoC to the binding docs. No to adding each SoC to the
driver as a seperate 'compatible' entry if not really needed to
distinguish IP versions. I mean imx31 should have two compatible entries
anyhow, one for imx31 and one for imx21 as fallback, no?

That all being said: Unless somebody objects, I'll pick the most recent
VF610 series today and leave the doc fixup for later.

Thanks,

   Wolfram

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130815/bc41abc3/attachment.sig>