From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette)
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:09:16 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] clk: ux500: Remove BML8580 clock
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZOPZE1aDw0NZDVX5_fVStqPFKqvLP-6dtjNawSCLg2Bg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1376257756-23575-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
 <20130815184202.4443.33356@quantum>
 <CACRpkdZOPZE1aDw0NZDVX5_fVStqPFKqvLP-6dtjNawSCLg2Bg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20130816190916.4443.68092@quantum>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Quoting Linus Walleij (2013-08-16 02:15:13)
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Quoting Linus Walleij (2013-08-11 14:49:16)
> >> From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >>
> >> There is no mention of the PRCMU_BML8580CLK in any of the Design
> >> Specifications for the chips supported in Mainline. In fact, where it
> >> is incorrectly used in the u8540 clock definition driver it would
> >> have the side effect of using the incorrect clock management address
> >> ([PRCM_BML8580CLK_MGT] 0x108 instead of the correct value 0x04C).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >
> > Pulled into clk-next.
> 
> 
> Hm it turns out that I need this to be in the middle of Lee's patch
> set for device tree clock that need to go through ARM SoC.
> 
> Can you (please) drop this patch and provide an ACK instead?

I've dropped the patch from clk-next. Please add my Ack.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij