[PATCH 00/10] ARM: clps711x: Initial DT support / Fixes

[shc_work@mail.ru (Alexander Shiyan)]

On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 23:29:00 -0700
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 07:54:42AM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 22:34:51 +0400
> > Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> wrote:
> > 
> > > Here is next patchset for the Cirrus Logic CLPS711X target CPUs.
> > > The first four patches is a small fixes. The rest is a attempt
> > > to add DT support for this subarch.
> > > As long as DT support is incomplete (no peripherals), I did not
> > > add DTS yet. This is the next step.
> > > 
> > > Alexander Shiyan (10):
> > >   ARM: clps711x: Remove the special name for the syscon driver
> > >   ARM: clps711x: Drop fortunet board support
> > >   ARM: clps711x: autcpu12: Remove incorrect config checking
> > >   ARM: clps711x: edb7211: Remove extra iotable_init() call
> > >   ARM: clps711x: Add CLPS711X clk driver
> > >   ARM: clps711x: Add CLPS711X clocksource driver
> > >   ARM: clps711x: Add CLPS711X irqchip driver
> > >   ARM: clps711x: Add CLPS711X cpuidle driver
> > >   ARM: clps711x: Migrate CLPS711X subarch to the new basic drivers
> > >   ARM: clps711x: Add initial DT support
> > [...]
> > 
> > If there is no objection about "fixes" part of patchset,
> > can these parts (1/10-4/10) be applied?
> > Thanks.
> 
> Definitely, I'll apply them to fixes-non-critical for 3.12.
> 
> Btw, Kevin Hilman is stepping in to help out with arm-soc maintenance, so
> please email arm at kenrel.org, since it's an alias that we are all on.
> 
> Also, I don't know if I've asked this of you before, but for these "smaller"
> platforms that don't see quite so much activity, it's easy for us to forget who
> wants us to apply patches and who stages branches. So emails like these are
> appreciated so we know if you want them applied, or if we'll get a pull request
> later. Clarifying in the patch posting if they are for review or for applying
> works too.

Do you mean always create CC to "arm at ..." for parts [0/xx] or after review period?
Thnaks.

-- 
Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>