From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:23:01 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 09/33] ARM: ux500: Supply the I2C clocks lookup to the DBX500 DT In-Reply-To: References: <1370521041-32318-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1370521041-32318-10-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20130822092301.GC22023@lee--X1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 20 Aug 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dbx5x0.dtsi > > @@ -572,6 +572,8 @@ > > v-i2c-supply = <&db8500_vape_reg>; > > > > clock-frequency = <400000>; > > + clocks = <&prcc_kclk 3 3>, <&prcc_pclk 3 3>; > > + clock-names = "nmk-i2c.0", "apb_pclk"; > > To avoid confusing the clock name "nmk-i2c.0" with the device > name in Linux of that device instance, can we use a name such > that it is clear that this is not a dev_name match? Once we've settled the other thread, I'll look into renaming this something less Linuxy. > "i2c0" works just fine as name I think? Sure. -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog