From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson)
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:57:12 -0700
Subject: [GIT PULL 3/3] 2nd Round Samsung mach-exynos for v3.12
In-Reply-To: <521CCC65.3070605@samsung.com>
References: <1f7701cea1f1$431f2d30$c95d8790$%kim@samsung.com>
 <3145165.ZB7l3vNJ7a@amdc1032>
 <CADGdYn7_Gm7rwkhRSUmvktB_hHNboY8eB5fi8E62-Br5Vk5D0A@mail.gmail.com>
 <4070794.XxjluIqBpK@amdc1032>
 <CADGdYn7YWscQ_EOqjbq29pNHvoxa0qqXHZeOBuz-Wi22H=Dc_w@mail.gmail.com>
 <87bo4j6aii.fsf@linaro.org> <521CCC65.3070605@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <20130827185712.GD22852@quad.lixom.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:57:25AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 08/27/13 13:08, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >amit daniel kachhap<amit.daniel@samsung.com>  writes:
> >
> >>Submitted the V2 version of this patch with your suggestion.
> >
> >So will there be an updated branch (and pull request) with these changes?
> >
> OK, Bart's concern makes sense so I replaced with Amit's v2 patch.
> 
> Kevin, here is updated branch so please pull following.
> 
> If any problems, please kindly let me know.

Please don't post pull requests in the middle of a comment thread; start a new
thread or at least do a new subject for them -- they are much too easy to miss
otherwise.


-Olof