linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com (Ezequiel Garcia)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] watchdog: orion: Remove unneeded BRIDGE_CAUSE clear
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:13:38 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130827191337.GA2339@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130827152535.GG19598@titan.lakedaemon.net>

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:25:35AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:11:37PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 04:39:39PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > > Dear Ezequiel Garcia,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:34:25 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > > > With the introduction of the orion irqchip driver, now the BRIDGE_CAUSE
> > > > bit is cleared by it. There's no longer a need to do it in the watchdog
> > > > driver, so we can simply remove it.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
> > > 
> > > Is this going to work with the platforms that use the orion_wdt driver
> > > but are not using the orion irqchip driver? Take for example
> > > mach-orion5x, it still uses the plat-orion/irq.c code and not the
> > > irqchip orion driver, as far as I can see.
> > > 
> > > The orion irqchip driver is DT only, so all of the Orion platforms that
> > > have not been converted to DT are still using the old irq code.
> > > 
> > > Any thoughts on the consequences of this in relation with your patch?
> > > 
> > 
> > Argh, you're right, We've completely missed this.
> > 
> > And it's a *very* important point because we need this patch
> > to ultimately get rid of the mach/brideg-regs.h.
> > 
> > Quite frankly I'm really out of ideas right now and unless someone
> > comes up with a smart solution, I see no other way but to:
> > 
> > 1. Implement an armada-wdt.c driver and stop trying to fix the world.
> > 2. Add some ugly ifdefs to avoid the mach-specific header.
> > 3. ?
> 
> 3. add a handler to plat-orion/irq.c ?
> 

Hm.. first of all: *why* do we need to clear this at all?

Does anybody has a clear explanation for this?
-- 
Ezequiel Garc?a, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-27 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-27 14:34 [PATCH 00/15] Armada 370/XP watchdog support Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 14:34 ` [PATCH 01/15] watchdog: orion: Remove unneeded BRIDGE_CAUSE clear Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 14:39   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-27 15:11     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 15:25       ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-27 19:13         ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2013-08-27 20:04           ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-27 21:02             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-08-27 21:41               ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-27 21:55                 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-27 22:04                   ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-27 22:11                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-08-28 12:02                       ` Jason Cooper
2013-09-05 16:32                   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-08-27 22:17               ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 22:25                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-08-28 12:08                   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-28 16:33                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-10-01 11:55                       ` Jason Cooper
2014-01-17 15:48                         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 14:34 ` [PATCH 02/15] ARM: orion: Assert watchdog RSTOUT enable bit Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 14:34 ` [PATCH 03/15] ARM: mvebu: Add watchdog RSTOUT enable in system-controller init Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 14:34 ` [PATCH 04/15] watchdog: orion: Remove RSTOUT bit enable/disable Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 14:34 ` [PATCH 05/15] watchdog: orion: Allow to build in any Orion platform Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 14:34 ` [PATCH 06/15] watchdog: orion: Introduce an orion_watchdog device structure Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 14:34 ` [PATCH 07/15] watchdog: orion: Introduce per-compatible of_device_id data Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 14:34 ` [PATCH 08/15] watchdog: orion: Add per-compatible clock initialization Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 14:34 ` [PATCH 09/15] watchdog: orion: Add support for Armada 370 and Armada XP SoC Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 14:34 ` [PATCH 10/15] ARM: mvebu: Add RSTOUT cell to system-controller DT node Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 14:34 ` [PATCH 11/15] ARM: mvebu: Enable Armada 370/XP watchdog in the devicetree Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 14:34 ` [PATCH 12/15] watchdog: orion: Rename device-tree binding documentation Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 14:34 ` [PATCH 13/15] watchdog: orion: Add other compatibles to devicetree binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 14:34 ` [PATCH 14/15] ARM: mvebu: system-controller: Add second reg cell devicetree specification Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 14:34 ` [PATCH 15/15] ARM: mvebu: Enable watchdog in defconfig Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 15:06 ` [PATCH 00/15] Armada 370/XP watchdog support Jason Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130827191337.GA2339@localhost \
    --to=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).