From: grant.likely@secretlab.ca (Grant Likely)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: devicetree: arm: cpus/cpu nodes bindings updates
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:45:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130828194558.568303E0A6F@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376559743-31848-2-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:42:22 +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> wrote:
> +=====================================
> +cpus and cpu node bindings definition
> +=====================================
> +
> +The ARM architecture, in accordance with the ePAPR, requires the cpus and cpu
> +nodes to be present and contain the properties described below.
> +
> +- cpus node
> +
> + Description: Container of cpu nodes
> +
> + The node name must be "cpus".
> +
> + A cpus node must define the following properties:
> +
> + - #address-cells
> + Usage: required
> + Value type: <u32>
> +
> + Definition depends on ARM architecture version and
> + configuration:
> +
> + # On uniprocessor ARM architectures previous to v7
> + value must be 0, since they have no register
> + providing CPU identification.
Just clued into this point from the other thread; Don't do this.
Uniprocessor should follow the same rules as 32bit or 64bit for the
value of #address-cells, and cpu nodes should have a reg property, even
if it is merely set to '0'.
g.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-28 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-15 9:42 [PATCH 0/2] ARM DT cpus/cpu and topology bindings Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-08-15 9:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: devicetree: arm: cpus/cpu nodes bindings updates Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-08-15 14:32 ` Rob Herring
2013-08-15 15:22 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-08-19 10:34 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-09-13 16:57 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-09-13 20:51 ` Rob Herring
2013-09-14 7:49 ` Andrew Lunn
2013-09-16 8:55 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-09-15 8:36 ` Andrew Lunn
2013-09-16 8:57 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-08-16 23:15 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-28 19:45 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2013-08-15 9:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: DT: arm: define CPU topology bindings Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-09-13 16:39 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-09-13 21:07 ` Rob Herring
2013-09-16 9:10 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130828194558.568303E0A6F@localhost \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox