linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dan.carpenter@oracle.com (Dan Carpenter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add i.MX23 support to the LRADC driver
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 17:27:39 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130904142738.GH6329@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378299706-6742-4-git-send-email-jbe@pengutronix.de>

On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 03:01:44PM +0200, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> @@ -323,10 +338,17 @@ static int mxs_lradc_ts_touched(struct mxs_lradc *lradc)
>  	uint32_t reg;
>  
>  	/* Enable touch detection. */
> -	writel(LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_PLATE_MASK,
> -		lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL0 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR);
> -	writel(LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_TOUCH_DETECT_ENABLE,
> -		lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL0 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET);
> +	if (lradc->soc == IMX28_LRADC) {
> +		writel(LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_PLATE_MASK,
> +			lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL0 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR);
> +		writel(LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_TOUCH_DETECT_ENABLE,
> +			lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL0 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET);
> +	} else {
> +		writel(LRADC_CTRL0_MX23_PLATE_MASK,
> +			lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL0 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR);
> +		writel(LRADC_CTRL0_MX23_TOUCH_DETECT_ENABLE,
> +			lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL0 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET);
> +	}

I don't like the way this patch takes the driver and makes every line
an if else statement.  It would be cleaner to do this:

	writel(lradc_plate_mask(lradc),
		lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL0 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR);
	writel(lradc_touch_detect_enable(lradc),
		lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL0 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET);

Btw, LRADC_CTRL0_MX23_TOUCH_DETECT_ENABLE just enables the touch screen
to detect touches?  It seems like we could leave the "DETECT_" out of
the name.

Actually it would better yet if there were a function:

static inline void lradc_writel(struct mxs_lradc *lradc, u32 val,
				size_t chan, size_t offset)
{
	writel(val, lradc->base + chan + offset);
}

That way we could do:

	lradc_writel(lradc_enable_touch(lradc), LRADC_CTRL0,
		     STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET);

ACTUALLY!  When I look at it now the third argument is almost always
"set", "clear" or "toggle".

So we could do:

static inline void lradc_reg_set(struct mxs_lradc *lradc, u32 val,
				size_t chan)
{
	writel(val, lradc->base + chan + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET);
}

So then it would be:

	lradc_reg_clear(lradc_plate_mask(lradc), LRADC_CTRL0);
	lradc_reg_set(lradc_enable_touch(lradc), LRADC_CTRL0);

I've just changed 11 lines of code down to 2 lines of code by hiding the
if statement in the header file.

Please redo this patch along those lines.

regards,
dan carpenter

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-04 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1378299706-6742-1-git-send-email-jbe@pengutronix.de>
2013-09-04 13:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: distinguish i.MX23's and i.MX28's LRADC Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 13:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: separate i.MX28 specific register bits Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 14:06   ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-05  7:12     ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-04 14:36   ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-05  7:13     ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-04 13:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add i.MX23 support to the LRADC driver Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 14:27   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2013-09-05 10:16     ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-05 10:42       ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-05 10:51         ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-05 18:15           ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-05 18:16       ` [patch] iio: mxs-lradc: use helper functions to simplify the code Dan Carpenter
2013-09-05 20:15         ` Fabio Estevam
2013-09-05 20:29           ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-06  8:39           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-09-06  7:01         ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-06  7:29           ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-04 13:01 ` [PATCH 4/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add interrupt driven touch detection Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 13:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: Remove old touchscreen detection implementation Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 14:37   ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-05  7:10     ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-06 10:08 [RFCv2] staging/iio/adc: change the MXS touchscreen driver implementation Juergen Beisert
2013-09-06 10:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add i.MX23 support to the LRADC driver Juergen Beisert
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-09  8:03 [RFCv3] staging/iio/adc: change the MXS touchscreen driver implementation Juergen Beisert
2013-09-09  8:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add i.MX23 support to the LRADC driver Juergen Beisert
2013-09-09 16:04   ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-10  7:36     ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-10  8:22       ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-10 12:58         ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-10 13:43           ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-10 20:54       ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-10 21:21         ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-11  7:07           ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-11  7:06         ` Jürgen Beisert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130904142738.GH6329@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).