From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:10:59 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 106/228] cpufreq: integrator: don't initialize part of policy that is set by core too In-Reply-To: <6d8d406ebca886e5147191cc8c333d926ef9eb30.1379063063.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> References: <6d8d406ebca886e5147191cc8c333d926ef9eb30.1379063063.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20130913161059.GD12758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 06:30:52PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence > this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. > > Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling > ->init(). > > Cc: Russell King > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > --- > drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c > index 8152a9b..babf3e4 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c > @@ -181,10 +181,9 @@ static int integrator_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > { > > /* set default policy and cpuinfo */ > - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = 160000; > - policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = 12000; > + policy->max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = 160000; > + policy->min = policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = 12000; > policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 1000000; /* 1 ms, assumed */ > - policy->cur = policy->min = policy->max = integrator_get(policy->cpu); This patch actually changes things - the description is misleading. Please explain why this change - which results in different values for policy->min and policy->max doesn't cause any functional difference. Thanks.