From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: fweisbec@gmail.com (Frederic Weisbecker) Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 16:19:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] arm: Fix build error with context tracking calls In-Reply-To: <87mwnggwv4.fsf@linaro.org> References: <20130909105115.GL25647@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <522DB86A.8010207@roeck-us.net> <20130909160348.GB18975@roeck-us.net> <20130909203141.GM25647@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130909210203.GC28416@roeck-us.net> <87y574g1fi.fsf@linaro.org> <20130913170331.GA8453@somewhere> <87mwnggwv4.fsf@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20130914141921.GB1718@localhost.localdomain> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 03:50:07PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Frederic Weisbecker writes: > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 08:07:45AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> Nicolas Pitre writes: > >> > >> > Adding Kevin Hilman to the CC as he might be interested as well. > >> > >> Thanks, I'd already noticed this but was distracted getting arm-soc > >> changes ready for the merge window. Looking into it now. > > > > Kevin, can you please try this patch? It built tested fine on ARM > > and live tested correctly on x86. There should be no problem but > > just in case. > > Tested-by: Kevin Hilman > > Things are back to working again on ARM. Thanks for the fix, and for > build testing on ARM. > > As you noticed to test on ARM, we still have to carry that patch to > drop that 'depends on 64BIT' in order to build/test this... any more > thoughts on what the remaining obstacles there are? I was mostly fine with your last patchset that enabled that + a few stuff to make it working on ARM. There were just a few details to polish. But I remember I sent detailed reviews, may be you missed them somewhow? Thanks.