From: jbe@pengutronix.de (Jürgen Beisert)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add interrupt driven touch detection
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:38:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201309161038.13977.jbe@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5235DBEA.7030402@kernel.org>
Hi Jonathan,
On Sunday 15 September 2013 18:10:18 Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 09/15/13 11:56, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On 09/11/13 09:18, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> >> For battery driven systems it is a very bad idea to collect the
> >> touchscreen data within a kernel busy loop.
> >>
> >> This change uses the features of the hardware to delay and accumulate
> >> samples in hardware to avoid a high interrupt and CPU load.
> >>
> >> Note: this is only tested on an i.MX23 SoC yet.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>
> >> CC: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> >> CC: devel at driverdev.osuosl.org
> >> CC: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> >> CC: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> >> CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
> >
> > While this driver is placed in IIO within staging at the moment, these
> > changes are definitely input related. Hence I have cc'd Dmitry and the
> > input list.
> >
> > I am personaly a little uncomfortable that we have such a complex bit of
> > input code sat within an IIO driver but such is life.
>
> The logic in here looks reasonable to me. I am far from a specialist in how
> these touch screens are normally handled though.
>
> One thing to note is that you really want to get a proposed device tree
> spec out asap as that can take longer to review than the driver. If you
> are proposing to do that as a future patch, then take into account that
> you'll need to ensure these are the defaults if it is not specified in the
> device tree for ever more (which is more painful than hammering out he
> device tree stuff now!)
> ...
Will do.
Regards,
Juergen
--
Pengutronix e.K. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| Juergen Beisert ? ? ? ? ? ? |
Linux Solutions for Science and Industry ? ? ?| http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-16 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-11 8:18 [RFCv4] staging/iio/adc: change the MXS touchscreen driver implementation Juergen Beisert
2013-09-11 8:18 ` [PATCH 1/6] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: distinguish i.MX23's and i.MX28's LRADC Juergen Beisert
2013-09-11 8:18 ` [PATCH 2/6] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: separate i.MX28 specific register bits Juergen Beisert
2013-09-15 10:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-09-11 8:18 ` [PATCH 3/6] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: simplify register access Juergen Beisert
2013-09-15 10:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-09-16 8:17 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-16 18:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-09-16 14:15 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-11 8:18 ` [PATCH 4/6] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add i.MX23 support to the LRADC touchscreen driver Juergen Beisert
2013-09-15 10:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-09-16 8:14 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-16 14:19 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-11 8:18 ` [PATCH 5/6] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add interrupt driven touch detection Juergen Beisert
2013-09-15 10:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-09-15 16:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-09-16 8:38 ` Jürgen Beisert [this message]
2013-09-16 8:10 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-16 9:37 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-16 14:23 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-16 14:34 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-16 15:10 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-16 15:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-09-19 12:49 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-19 16:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-09-16 15:28 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2013-09-17 7:33 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-11 8:18 ` [PATCH 6/6] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: Remove old touchscreen detection implementation Juergen Beisert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201309161038.13977.jbe@pengutronix.de \
--to=jbe@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).