From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sre@ring0.de (Sebastian Reichel) Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 21:27:22 +0200 Subject: [RFCv2 3/3] ARM: dts: N900: Add SSI information In-Reply-To: <20130916181032.GB30568@blackmetal.musicnaut.iki.fi> References: <1379277856-24571-1-git-send-email-sre@debian.org> <1379277856-24571-4-git-send-email-sre@debian.org> <20130916150147.GA14047@earth.universe> <20130916181032.GB30568@blackmetal.musicnaut.iki.fi> Message-ID: <20130916192722.GB21903@earth.universe> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 09:10:32PM +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:01:47PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > > Is the Synchronous Serial Interface (SSI) only supported by > > > OMAP34xx/OMAP35xx SoC and not by OMAP36xx/OMAP37xx SoC? > > > > > > I'm asking this since if SSI is supported by both we should add the > > > device nodes in omap3.dtsi instead of omap34xx.dtsi. > > > > > > I thought that all OMAP3 SoC supported SSI and all OMAP4 SoC supported > > > HSI but I guess I was wrong... > > > > I just do not know. Information about the SSI core is not included > > in the public OMAP TRM. It only lists the memory space as reserved. > > > > Thus I only included it in OMAP34xx, which is used in Nokia N900 and > > must support SSI. > > I think N9 and N950 (OMAP3630) are using pretty much the same driver. OK. I've checked the N950 kernel from [0] and it uses the same data. I will move the data from omap34xx.dtsi to omap3.dtsi in the next RFC. Thanks for the hint. [0] https://github.com/nemomobile/kernel-adaptation-n950-n9/ -- Sebastian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: