From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:17:44 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: OMAP: Add secure function omap_smc3() which calling instruction smc #1 In-Reply-To: <201309171753.24433@pali> References: <20130916171023.GA17477@localhost.localdomain> <20130917154331.GA9994@atomide.com> <201309171753.24433@pali> Message-ID: <20130917231744.GJ9994@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Pali Roh?r [130917 09:01]: > On Tuesday 17 September 2013 17:43:31 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Have you guys checked how this works with the recently posted > > "[PATCH v6 0/5] ARM: support for Trusted Foundations secure > > monitor" series? > > this code looks like some Tegra and "Trusted Foundations" > specific. There is Note: The API followed by Trusted Foundations > does *not* follow the SMC calling conventions. Also code calling > smc #0 instruction, so in my opinion for rx51 it is useless. OK, so still no generic SMC code then :( This patch is fine with me. > Tony, can you include this two rx51 secure patches (patch v4 1/2 > and patch v2 2/2)? Or is there some any other problem? No other comments on this patch, I'll post some comments on the v2 2/2 patch considering we're moving to device tree based booting. Regards, Tony