From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: balbi@ti.com (Felipe Balbi) Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:48:17 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] usb: musb: Call atomic_notifier_call_chain when status is changed In-Reply-To: <201309181843.49850@pali> References: <1378630239-10006-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <201309181756.12782@pali> <20130918163649.GL21559@radagast> <201309181843.49850@pali> Message-ID: <20130918164816.GN21559@radagast> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 06:43:49PM +0200, Pali Roh?r wrote: > On Wednesday 18 September 2013 18:36:49 Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 05:56:12PM +0200, Pali Roh?r wrote: > > > On Wednesday 18 September 2013 15:57:13 Javier Martinez > > > Canillas > > > > > > wrote: > > > > to split the patch in two since the patch was solving > > > > two separate issues > > > > > > My patch does not solving *two* issues. It is *one* > > > regression and both parts of patch are needed for fixing > > > it. Read commit message again. It does not make sense to > > > split patch fixing kernel regression into more one line > > > patches - or please clarify why. > > > > issue 1) twl4030-usb.c doesn't initialize atomic notifier head > > issue 2) musb doesn't call notifier chain > > > > do you need a drawing ? > > Regression 1) power supply drivers not working since v3.5 > > Look at firsts emails. > > > Do you really have problem to do what *you* need with 1 line > patch which I sent? Or what what you want? if you had already resent patches the way I requested, they'd already be applied. Instead you chose to troll the people who are trying to helping out. You have two issues being fixed in the same patch and that's not acceptable. -- balbi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: