From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pali.rohar@gmail.com (Pali =?utf-8?q?Roh=C3=A1r?=) Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 17:56:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] usb: musb: Call atomic_notifier_call_chain when status is changed In-Reply-To: References: <1378630239-10006-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <20130918133025.GB2953@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> Message-ID: <201309181756.12782@pali> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 18 September 2013 15:57:13 Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > to split the patch in two since the patch was solving > two separate issues My patch does not solving *two* issues. It is *one* regression and both parts of patch are needed for fixing it. Read commit message again. It does not make sense to split patch fixing kernel regression into more one line patches - or please clarify why. -- Pali Roh?r pali.rohar at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: