From: steve.capper@linaro.org (Steve Capper)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC V2] ARM: mm: make UACCESS_WITH_MEMCPY huge page aware
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:10:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130923141000.GA8938@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130923132151.GS12758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:21:51PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:19:24PM +0100, Steve Capper wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:33:49AM +0100, Steve Capper wrote:
> > > The memory pinning code in uaccess_with_memcpy.c does not check
> > > for HugeTLB or THP pmds, and will enter an infinite loop should
> > > a __copy_to_user or __clear_user occur against a huge page.
> > >
> > > This patch adds detection code for huge pages to pin_page_for_write.
> > > As this code can be executed in a fast path it refers to the actual
> > > pmds rather than the vma. If a HugeTLB or THP is found (they have
> > > the same pmd representation on ARM), the page table spinlock is
> > > taken to prevent modification whilst the page is pinned.
> > >
> > > On ARM, huge pages are only represented as pmds, thus no huge pud
> > > checks are performed. (For huge puds one would lock the page table
> > > in a similar manner as in the pmd case).
> > >
> > > Two helper functions are introduced; pmd_thp_or_huge will check
> > > whether or not a page is huge or transparent huge (which have the
> > > same pmd layout on ARM), and pmd_hugewillfault will detect whether
> > > or not a page fault will occur on write to the page.
> > >
> > > Changes since first RFC:
> > > * The page mask is widened for hugepages to reduce the number
> > > of potential locks/unlocks.
> > > (A knobbled /dev/zero with its latency reduction chunks
> > > removed shows a 2x data rate boost with hugepages backing:
> > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=10M count=1024 )
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> >
> > A ping to see if anyone had any questions/comments/flames :-)?
> >
> > Should it go into the patch system?
>
> IIRC Nicolas wrote the original support, so he should probably be Cc'd with
> this patch.
>
Thank you, I will resend the patch with Nicolas on CC.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-23 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-17 9:33 [RFC V2] ARM: mm: make UACCESS_WITH_MEMCPY huge page aware Steve Capper
2013-09-23 13:19 ` Steve Capper
2013-09-23 13:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-09-23 14:10 ` Steve Capper [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130923141000.GA8938@linaro.org \
--to=steve.capper@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).