From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com (Ezequiel Garcia)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:10:30 -0300
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: kirkwood: Remove kirkwood_setup_wins and
 rely on the DT binding (Was Re: ..)
In-Reply-To: <20130930175939.GE28898@obsidianresearch.com>
References: <20130917184146.GD21230@obsidianresearch.com>
 <20130929203314.GA2457@localhost>
 <20130930174245.GB28898@obsidianresearch.com>
 <20130930175611.GA2607@localhost>
 <20130930175939.GE28898@obsidianresearch.com>
Message-ID: <20130930181029.GC2607@localhost>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:59:39AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 02:56:12PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > Well, I booted the board with the patch, but didn't do any crypto-specific
> > testings. That said, I don't have any strong opinion on the crypto-node moving
> > or splitting.
> > 
> > Have you worked that out?
> 
> I feel it is the same situation as the NAND, moving it doesn't
> preclude any future fixups. Keeping it outside the mbus node is
> mis-using the mbus binding.
> 

Agreed.

-- 
Ezequiel Garc?a, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com