linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC, PATCH] clocksource: provide timekeeping for efm32 SoCs
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 10:08:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131001080829.GJ2548@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5242F434.7060702@linaro.org>

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 04:33:24PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/16/2013 11:44 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I'm not sure that the way I implemented if a given timer is used as
> > clock_source or clock_event_device is robust. Does it need locking?
> > The reason to create a timer device for each timer instead of a single
> > device of all of them is that it makes it cleaner to specify irqs and
> > clks which each timer has one of each respectively. I didn't find an
> > example, but while looking I wondered if in zevio-timer.c a single timer
> > can really support both clock_event and clocksource.
> > 
> > I guess for inclusion I need to write a document describing the
> > of-binding. I will include that in the next iteration.
> 
> Right and a nice description of the timer would be valuable.
Where is the location to put a device tree binding document for a
clocksource/clock event device? I found

	arm,armv7-timer-mem	| arm/arch_timer.txt
	fsl,timrot		| N/A
	nvidia,tegra20-rtc	| rtc/nvidia,tegra20-rtc.txt

Should I introduce a "clocksource" directory below
Documentation/devicetree/bindings?

Other than that if there are no further comments I'll sent a v2 soon.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-10-01  8:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-16  9:44 [RFC, PATCH] clocksource: provide timekeeping for efm32 SoCs Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-25 14:33 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-09-25 15:32   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-25 23:49     ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-09-25 23:55       ` John Stultz
2013-09-26  7:58         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-26  8:20       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-26  8:52         ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-09-26  9:05           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-01  8:08   ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2013-10-01 15:57     ` Stephen Warren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131001080829.GJ2548@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).