From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm: vfp: always clear vfp_current_hw_state when forcing reload
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 23:11:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131002221123.GC12758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380751187-11257-1-git-send-email-zyy@motorola.com>
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:59:47PM -0500, Yuanyuan Zhong wrote:
> The current thread trying to clear the held vfp state may not be
> the owner of hw state. For example,
> Core0 Core1
> Thread1 uses VFP.
> Thread1 vfpstate.hard.cpu = 1.
> vfp_current_hw_state[1] points to Thread1
> vfpstate.
> Going to suspend.
> Freeze Thread1.
> Thread1 is switched out.
> VFP HW registers saved to Thread1 vfpstate.
Correct so far. At this point:
vfp_current_hw_state[1] = &thread1->vfpstate;
thread1->vfpstate.hard.cpu = 1;
> Core0 disables Core1.
> Stopper thread calls vfp_force_reload().
> Stopper thread vfpstate.hard.cpu = NR_CPUS.
Correct, except there's another part to this. vfp_state_in_hw() returns
true here, since thread1->vfpstate.hard.cpu is the dying CPU (CPU 1), and
vfp_current_hw_state[1] is &thread1->vfpstate. So we also do this:
clear FPEXC_EN
vfp_current_hw_state[1] = NULL;
> ...
> (No PM notifier for non-idle path. So
> vfp_pm_suspend() is NOT called on Core1.)
> ...
> Core1 is off and VFP HW registers are lost.
> ...
> Core0 enables Core1.
> Core0 thaw Thread1.
> Thread1 migrate to Core1
> before using VFP.
> Thread1 starts using VFP.
> Now we have vfp_current_hw_state[1] points
> to Thread1 vfpstate. And Thread1 has
> vfpstate.hard.cpu = 1.
No. With my above correction:
vfp_current_hw_state[1] = NULL
and that forces a reload of the saved context.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-02 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-02 21:59 [PATCH] arm: vfp: always clear vfp_current_hw_state when forcing reload Yuanyuan Zhong
2013-10-02 22:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2013-10-02 22:21 ` Yuanyuan ZHONG
2013-10-10 16:00 ` Yuanyuan ZHONG
2013-10-11 12:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-11 16:12 ` Yuanyuan ZHONG
2013-10-11 16:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-11 18:08 ` Yuanyuan ZHONG
2013-10-13 5:32 ` Yuanyuan ZHONG
2014-01-05 19:48 ` Murali N
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131002221123.GC12758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).