From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg KH)
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 06:23:29 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v7 09/10] usb: dwc3: omap: manage "usb_otg_ss_refclk960m"
 clock
In-Reply-To: <524E9C70.8050303@ti.com>
References: <1379508542-22389-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com>
 <1379508542-22389-10-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com>
 <52403E02.4070208@ti.com> <20131002131113.GM1476@radagast>
 <524C22A1.30200@ti.com> <20131003122941.GD3230@radagast>
 <524D8516.8000107@ti.com> <20131003154144.GA18189@kroah.com>
 <524E9C70.8050303@ti.com>
Message-ID: <20131004132329.GA25648@kroah.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 01:46:08PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Greg,
> 
> On 10/03/2013 06:41 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 05:54:14PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> On 10/03/2013 03:29 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:41:53PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>>> On 10/02/2013 04:11 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:11:30PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi Felipe,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 09/18/2013 03:49 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>>>>>> "usb_otg_ss_refclk960m" is an optional functional clock to the
> >>>>>>> UBS_OTG_SS module. So manage it in the driver.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Just realized that "usb_otg_ss_refclk960m" is in fact functional clock to the 
> >>>>>> PHY and not USB_OTG_SS module. The name is misleading.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So please ignore patch 9 and 10.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ignored. All others are fine, right ?
> >>>>>
> >>>> Yes. But I might have to rebase this on top of Phy framework stuff.
> >>>
> >>> alright, Greg already took the PHY framework, so maybe we need to just
> >>> give him my Acked-by and he takes the patches directly as I don't have
> >>> PYH framework.
> >>>
> >> OK. I'll resend this series to Greg in a while.
> > 
> > It looks like you did, but forgot Felipe's ack :(
> > 
> I was under the impression that Felipe will explicitly give his Ack there.
> Should I resend with his Acked-bys?

No need, I took the patches yesterday, you should have seen the
automated emails, right?

greg k-h