From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Introduce driver option handling
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:06:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131008150613.GC21189@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381224444-27303-2-git-send-email-andreas.herrmann@calxeda.com>
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 10:27:20AM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> Introduce handling of driver options. Options are set based on DT
> information when probing an SMMU device. The first option introduced
> is "arm,smmu-isolate-devices". (It will be used in the bus notifier
> block.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann@calxeda.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index b632bcd..b127f0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -348,6 +348,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
> #define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_TRANS_S2 (1 << 3)
> #define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_TRANS_NESTED (1 << 4)
> u32 features;
> + u32 options;
This should be enum arm_smmu_option. Also, we should probably be consistent
between the options and features (i.e. either use an enum for each of them,
or just stick to #defines for both).
> int version;
>
> u32 num_context_banks;
> @@ -398,6 +399,52 @@ struct arm_smmu_domain {
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(arm_smmu_devices_lock);
> static LIST_HEAD(arm_smmu_devices);
>
> +/* driver options */
> +enum arm_smmu_option {
> + ISOLATE_DEVICES = 0,
> + OPTION_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +struct arm_smmu_option_prop {
> + enum arm_smmu_option opt;
> + const char *prop;
> +};
> +
> +static struct arm_smmu_option_prop arm_smmu_options [] = {
> + { ISOLATE_DEVICES, "arm,smmu-isolate-devices" },
> + { OPTION_MAX, NULL},
> +};
> +
> +static inline int arm_smmu_has_option(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> + enum arm_smmu_option opt)
> +{
> + return (smmu->options & (1 << opt));
> +}
> +
> +static inline void arm_smmu_set_option(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> + enum arm_smmu_option opt)
> +{
> + smmu->options |= (1 << opt);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void arm_smmu_clear_option(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> + enum arm_smmu_option opt)
> +{
> + smmu->options &= ~(1 << opt);
> +}
These three functions are a bit over-engineered! We have things like
__set_bit if you really want to use helpers.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-08 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-08 9:27 [PATCH 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Misc modifications to support SMMUs on Calxeda ECX-2000 Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 9:27 ` [PATCH 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Introduce driver option handling Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 15:06 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2013-10-08 15:16 ` Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 9:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Introduce bus notifier block Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 9:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Introduce stream ID masking Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 15:10 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-08 15:20 ` Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 16:40 ` Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 16:59 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-08 18:18 ` Sethi Varun-B16395
2013-10-08 18:43 ` Rob Herring
2013-10-09 10:09 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-09 23:10 ` Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-09 22:55 ` Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 9:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Support buggy implementations where all config accesses are secure Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 9:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: dts: Add nodes for SMMUs on Calxeda ECX-2000 Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 10:31 ` [PATCH] documentation/iommu: Update description of ARM System MMU binding Andreas Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131008150613.GC21189@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).