From: andreas.herrmann@calxeda.com (Andreas Herrmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Introduce stream ID masking
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 17:20:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131008152008.GE2935@alberich> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131008151007.GD21189@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 11:10:07AM -0400, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 10:27:22AM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > Ie. use a mask based on smr_mask_bits to map all stream IDs of an SMMU
> > to one context.
> >
> > This behaviour is controlled per SMMU node with DT property
> > "arm,smmu-mask-stream-ids" and is only allowed if just a single master
> > is attached to an SMMU. If the option is specified, all stream-ids
> > that are provided in DT for the single master have no relevance.
> >
> > This is useful/convenient if a master has more than 8 stream-ids or if
> > not all stream-ids are known for a master device.
>
> Hmmm, this really scares me. What's the use-case? I worry about people
> inadvertently putting devices into an iommu domain because they happen to be
> included in a mask. Your solution seems to be targetting a single master
> with lots of IDs -- is this a PCI RC?
No, it's the sata device. It has 0xf as smr_mask_bits.
But it's just one device and it (usually) should be mapped to one
context -- no matter how many StreamIDs are really used.
(PCI RC has also 0xf but there it's clear there can be multiple devices
and the masking should not be done.)
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-08 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-08 9:27 [PATCH 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Misc modifications to support SMMUs on Calxeda ECX-2000 Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 9:27 ` [PATCH 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Introduce driver option handling Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 15:06 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-08 15:16 ` Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 9:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Introduce bus notifier block Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 9:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Introduce stream ID masking Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 15:10 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-08 15:20 ` Andreas Herrmann [this message]
2013-10-08 16:40 ` Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 16:59 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-08 18:18 ` Sethi Varun-B16395
2013-10-08 18:43 ` Rob Herring
2013-10-09 10:09 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-09 23:10 ` Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-09 22:55 ` Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 9:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Support buggy implementations where all config accesses are secure Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 9:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: dts: Add nodes for SMMUs on Calxeda ECX-2000 Andreas Herrmann
2013-10-08 10:31 ` [PATCH] documentation/iommu: Update description of ARM System MMU binding Andreas Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131008152008.GE2935@alberich \
--to=andreas.herrmann@calxeda.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).