From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:03:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add I2C support to ST SoCs In-Reply-To: <525675B6.4080404@st.com> References: <1381250576-7916-1-git-send-email-maxime.coquelin@st.com> <525675B6.4080404@st.com> Message-ID: <20131010100354.GE2638@katana> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > Changes since v3: > > - Switch back to vendor specific DT properties regarding the anti-glitch > > filter configuration, as this IP is the only one having such a filter. > Do you agree to keep these properties vendor-specifics? My preference is generic bindings. There are no other users right now, yet there might be in the future. At least with something similar enough that the bindings will apply. Was hoping for some additional input, though, but I am not depending on it. > If so, could you take this series for v3.13? Sure, if it passes the second review... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: