From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:07:33 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: include: asm: atomic.h: use 'unsigned int'
 and 'atomic_t' instead of 'unsigned long' for atomic_clear_mask()
In-Reply-To: <52561269.60900@asianux.com>
References: <52561137.3070608@asianux.com> <5256117A.4000009@asianux.com>
 <5256121A.9030504@asianux.com> <52561269.60900@asianux.com>
Message-ID: <20131010100733.GH3817@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:35:21AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
> In current kernel wide source, for arm64, only s390 scsi drivers use
> atomic_clear_mask(), now, s390 itself need use 'unsigned int' and
> 'atomic_t', so need match s390's atomic_clear_mask().
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h |   13 +++++++------
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h
> index 8363644..58808fc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h
> @@ -126,16 +126,17 @@ static inline int atomic_cmpxchg(atomic_t *ptr, int old, int new)
>  	return oldval;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void atomic_clear_mask(unsigned long mask, unsigned long *addr)
> +static inline void atomic_clear_mask(unsigned int mask, atomic_t *ptr)
>  {
> -	unsigned long tmp, tmp2;
> +	unsigned int tmp;

Same comment here as for ARM; I think you want a signed int.

Will