From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: include: asm: atomic.h: use 'unsigned int' and 'atomic_t' instead of 'unsigned long' for atomic_clear_mask()
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:44:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131011104419.GE14732@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <525751E2.3020207@asianux.com>
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 02:18:26AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 10/10/2013 10:23 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:03:52PM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
> >> BTW: do arm64 need atomic_clear_mask()?
> >
> > No. Neither ARM nor arm64 need this function.
>
> OK, thank you for your confirmation.
>
> Hmm... can we remove atomic_clear_mask() from ARM and arm64? (in my
> opinion, if not need, better to remove it).
Yes!
I mentioned this a few times already...
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-11 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-10 2:30 [PATCH 0/3] s390/arm/arm64: include: asm: atomic.h: use 'unsigned int' and 'atomic_t' instead of 'unsigned long' for atomic_*_mask() Chen Gang
2013-10-10 2:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] s390: include: asm: atomic.h: use 'unsigned int' " Chen Gang
2013-10-10 2:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm: include: asm: atomic.h: use 'unsigned int' and 'atomic' instead of 'unsigned long' for atomic_clear_mask() Chen Gang
2013-10-10 2:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: include: asm: atomic.h: use 'unsigned int' and 'atomic_t' " Chen Gang
2013-10-10 10:07 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-10 11:03 ` Chen Gang
2013-10-10 14:23 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-11 1:18 ` Chen Gang
2013-10-11 10:44 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2013-10-11 11:25 ` Chen Gang
2013-10-11 11:47 ` [PATCH] arm/arm64: remove atomic_clear_mask() in "include/asm/atomic.h" Chen Gang
2013-10-11 12:08 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-10-11 12:28 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-11 13:03 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-10-12 1:36 ` Chen Gang
2013-10-12 2:09 ` Chen Gang
2013-10-11 16:55 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-12 1:46 ` Chen Gang
2013-10-12 22:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-11-04 7:36 ` Chen Gang
2013-11-04 10:07 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-04 10:15 ` Chen Gang
2013-10-10 9:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm: include: asm: atomic.h: use 'unsigned int' and 'atomic' instead of 'unsigned long' for atomic_clear_mask() Will Deacon
2013-10-10 11:02 ` Chen Gang
2013-10-10 7:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] s390: include: asm: atomic.h: use 'unsigned int' instead of 'unsigned long' for atomic_*_mask() Heiko Carstens
2013-10-10 7:34 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131011104419.GE14732@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).