From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:27:58 +0100
Subject: New big-endian patch series against 3.12-rc4
In-Reply-To: <20131017142053.66eb5e3b@skate>
References: <1381271679-27804-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
 <20131017140712.6312f71a@skate>
 <20131017121529.GL18765@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
 <20131017142053.66eb5e3b@skate>
Message-ID: <20131017122758.GM18765@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 01:20:53PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Will Deacon,
> 
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:15:30 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> 
> > > Maybe Nicolas or Will can comment on the best way to make things
> > > move forward with this patch set.
> > 
> > There are a good number of acks on this now, so I think a pull
> > request to rmk with the latest version based on something like -rc3
> > (since that's where devel-stable is) would be the best thing to do.
> > Then they can enjoy some time in -next and we can iron out any
> > conflicts that might crop up.
> 
> Well, the e-mail I was replying to was already a pull request sent to
> rmk, and there has been a number of other similar pull requests made by
> Ben during the previous iterations, and there has never been any
> reaction from rmk (as far as I can remember, of course).

Hmm, the email doesn't have [GIT PULL] in the subject and I don't see
linux+pull at arm.linux.org.uk in the to/cc list, so maybe that explain why
it's not getting picked up!

Will