From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul) Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 19:18:46 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 01/28] dmaengine: use DMA_COMPLETE for dma completion status In-Reply-To: <20131017142755.GA4477@breakpoint.cc> References: <1381940926-25564-1-git-send-email-vinod.koul@intel.com> <1381940926-25564-2-git-send-email-vinod.koul@intel.com> <20131017020745.GA14013@intel.com> <20131017142755.GA4477@breakpoint.cc> Message-ID: <20131017134846.GG14013@intel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 04:27:55PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 07:37:45AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > index 0bc7275..683c380 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h > > +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h > > @@ -45,16 +45,17 @@ static inline int dma_submit_error(dma_cookie_t cookie) > > > > /** > > * enum dma_status - DMA transaction status > > - * @DMA_SUCCESS: transaction completed successfully > > + * @DMA_COMPLETE: transaction completed > > * @DMA_IN_PROGRESS: transaction not yet processed > > * @DMA_PAUSED: transaction is paused > > * @DMA_ERROR: transaction failed > > */ > > enum dma_status { > > - DMA_SUCCESS, > > + DMA_COMPLETE, > > DMA_IN_PROGRESS, > > DMA_PAUSED, > > DMA_ERROR, > > + DMA_SUCCESS, > > }; > > There are some drivers which compare against == or != DMA_SUCCESS. Shouldn't this > become > enum dma_status { > - DMA_SUCCESS, > + DMA_COMPLETE = 0, DMA_SUCCESS = 0, > DMA_IN_PROGRESS, > DMA_PAUSED, > DMA_ERROR, > }; > > so nothing breaks during the transition? Yes i missed it in first place update the patch to fix that ~Vinod