From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 18:46:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 4/4] sound/soc/atmel: don't use devm_pinctrl_get_select_default() in probe In-Reply-To: <20131014163753.GF2443@sirena.org.uk> References: <1381681071-6021-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <1381681071-6021-5-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <20131014131748.GU2443@sirena.org.uk> <20131014145629.GA17351@katana> <20131014163753.GF2443@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: <20131017164331.GA2896@katana> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > > Applied, thanks. Please use subject lines appropriate to the subsystem. > > > That's quite a nut to crack with a generated patch series running over > > the whole tree. I wonder if it is really worth the effort? > > I think it's probably worth the effort to add something to put rules for > these things in MAINTAINERS, it'd cover 90% of cases. If you're sending > only one of a big series with a subject line that won't pattern match > that's a good way to get stuff dropped on the floor. On the other hand, MAINTAINERS information gets overlooked and/or could get stale. Thinking about it again, it is probably less work (at least for me with i2c) to create a git-hook fixing the subject line than to always nag people. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: