From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:42:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v8 08/19] arm/xen: get_dma_ops: return xen_dma_ops if we are running as xen_initial_domain In-Reply-To: References: <1382031814-8782-8-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> Message-ID: <20131018154246.GB25034@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:22:18PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Russell, > are you OK with this patch? Only concern is why the change is soo large. > > -static inline struct dma_map_ops *get_dma_ops(struct device *dev) > > +static inline struct dma_map_ops *__generic_dma_ops(struct device *dev) > > { > > if (dev && dev->archdata.dma_ops) > > return dev->archdata.dma_ops; > > return &arm_dma_ops; > > } > > > > +static inline struct dma_map_ops *get_dma_ops(struct device *dev) > > +{ > > + if (xen_initial_domain()) > > + return xen_dma_ops; > > + else > > + return __generic_dma_ops(dev); > > +} > > + What's wrong with: static inline struct dma_map_ops *get_dma_ops(struct device *dev) { + if (xen_initial_domain()) + return xen_dma_ops; if (dev && dev->archdata.dma_ops) return dev->archdata.dma_ops; return &arm_dma_ops; }