From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:22:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] imx6q: fix emergency restart
In-Reply-To: <1380832337-4637-1-git-send-email-nathan_lynch@mentor.com>
References: <1380832337-4637-1-git-send-email-nathan_lynch@mentor.com>
Message-ID: <20131020232217.GS25034@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:32:17PM -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> @@ -192,8 +188,15 @@ static void __init imx6q_1588_init(void)
>  
>  static void __init imx6q_init_machine(void)
>  {
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +
>  	imx6q_enet_phy_init();
>  
> +	np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,imx6q-wdt");
> +	if (np)
> +		wdog_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> +	pr_info("%s: wdog_base = %p\n", __func__, wdog_base);

I don't know whether this has been applied yet, but please don't add
to the kernel messages unnecessarily; there's already enough of them
and unless it provides something which is useful, it doesn't deserve
to be at "info" level.  If you want it to report it for debugging,
then please use the debugging level.

Specifically for imx6q, I'm finding the boot is noisy enough that it
takes some time to find the bits you want to find amongst the 240-odd
lines it spits out.

Also, I don't see it in arm-soc yet - is there a reason this isn't
queued as a fix?  Without it, using sysrq to force a reboot is rather
counter-productive.

Thanks.