From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: richardcochran@gmail.com (Richard Cochran)
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:07:11 +0200
Subject: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] ARM topic: Is DT on ARM the solution, or
 is there something better?
In-Reply-To: <20131021091555.GB21518@ulmo.nvidia.com>
References: <52644A9E.3060007@wwwdotorg.org>
 <20131020220839.GT2443@sirena.org.uk>
 <5264576F.6050307@wwwdotorg.org>
 <alpine.LFD.2.03.1310201911190.1951@syhkavp.arg>
 <20131021091555.GB21518@ulmo.nvidia.com>
Message-ID: <20131021170711.GA5256@netboy>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:15:56AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> 
> Right now, we're taking away much of that flexibility and I see progress
> on ARM actively hindered.

Baloney.

No one is taking away your flexibility or hindering progress. It is
really very simple. Just make an arm-dt-devel tree where you can both
change the bindings at will and recommend to people. Once bindings
have seen some real world testing and have had time to mature, then
request a merge into mainline.

Thanks,
Richard