From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: richardcochran@gmail.com (Richard Cochran)
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:47:37 +0200
Subject: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] ARM topic: Is DT on ARM the solution, or
 is there something better?
In-Reply-To: <20131023172955.GA17145@obsidianresearch.com>
References: <20131020220839.GT2443@sirena.org.uk>
 <5264576F.6050307@wwwdotorg.org>
 <alpine.LFD.2.03.1310201911190.1951@syhkavp.arg>
 <52658EBC.8020800@wwwdotorg.org>
 <alpine.LFD.2.03.1310211632460.1951@syhkavp.arg>
 <20131022093923.GC15640@ulmo.nvidia.com>
 <20131022150426.GF29341@beef>
 <20131022171346.GE4061@obsidianresearch.com>
 <20131023080630.GA14413@netboy>
 <20131023172955.GA17145@obsidianresearch.com>
Message-ID: <20131023174736.GD5208@netboy>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:29:55AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> 
> I've seen that nebulous answer before. It is awfully vauge. Don't you
> think a better, more excting answer is required to commit the kernel
> community to such a huge amount of work+pain?
> 
> What users? What use cases? Who exactly?

Gimme a break. The use case I mentioned is not at all vague. It is
about a specific a use case as you'll ever see.
 
> Crucially: Does the above justify the huge effort on the kernel side?

The effort is no more or less than is required of every other kernel
development.

Thanks,
Richard