From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thierry.reding@gmail.com (Thierry Reding) Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:38:34 +0200 Subject: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] ARM topic: Is DT on ARM the solution, or is there something better? In-Reply-To: <465e75de15f7d79c3b57a3b88024e739.squirrel@twosheds.infradead.org> References: <20131024095232.27BBCC4039D@trevor.secretlab.ca> <1382614439.6040.16.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> <1382615278.8522.72.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20131024122346.GD11296@ulmo.nvidia.com> <1382619655.6040.52.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> <516bfc7f9366ff3ef9187c36dd160888.squirrel@twosheds.infradead.org> <1382621431.6040.66.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> <20131024141955.GB25061@ulmo.nvidia.com> <465e75de15f7d79c3b57a3b88024e739.squirrel@twosheds.infradead.org> Message-ID: <20131024143832.GA9044@ulmo.nvidia.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:30:09PM -0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:05:58PM -0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 13:10 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> > > >> >> Note that you are not describing a normal "DT scenario" here. You are > >> >> describing a case in which we screwed up > >> > > >> > AKA "real world" > >> > >> No. Absolutely not. That was a screwup, and it needs to be *rare*. The > >> excuses you present for it are crappy and uunacceptable. > > > > That's not helping. The fact is that is has happened. > > It has happened, yes. But we're describing how things *shall* work going > forward. Coping with existing mistakes is a slightly separate issue. > (Albeit only slightly since mistakes *will* continue to happen, but > hopefully more rarely so our defined processes for coping are based on the > assumption that it should be rare) Agreed. Thierry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: