From: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com (Dmitry Torokhov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] input: Remove OOM message after input_allocate_device
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:10:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131024191032.GA5553@core.coreip.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382640339.22433.73.camel@joe-AO722>
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:45:39AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 11:37 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Joe,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:14:50PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > Emitting an OOM message isn't necessary after input_allocate_device
> > > as there's a generic OOM and a dump_stack already done.
> >
> > No, please don't. The kzalloc may get changed in the future to not dump
> > stack (that was added originally because not everyone was handling OOM
> > properly, right?), input core might get changed to use something else
> > than kzalloc, etc, etc.
> >
> > The majority of errors use dev_err so we also get idea what device
> > failed (if there are several), and more.
>
> I think that's not valuable as input_allocate_device already has
> dozens of locations that don't emit a specific OOM and centralizing
> the location for any generic message would work anyway.
Not having diagnostic messages in some of the drivers is hardly a
justification to remove them from everywhere else.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-24 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-23 19:14 [PATCH 0/8] treewide: Remove OOM message after input_alloc_device Joe Perches
2013-10-23 19:14 ` [PATCH 4/8] input: Remove OOM message after input_allocate_device Joe Perches
2013-10-24 18:26 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-24 18:43 ` Joe Perches
2013-10-24 18:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-24 18:48 ` Joe Perches
2013-10-24 19:15 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-24 18:37 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2013-10-24 18:45 ` Joe Perches
2013-10-24 19:10 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2013-10-24 19:20 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131024191032.GA5553@core.coreip.homeip.net \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).