linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PULL REQ] Big Endian initial patch series
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:44:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131028084455.GA20218@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131028004736.GG16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

Hi Russell,

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:47:36AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 08:51:35PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > On 19/10/13 18:09, Will Deacon wrote:
> >> Do you think you could send another pull request please?
> >
> > Ok, sorted.
> 
> Pulled, but there was a conflict.  Please check this resolution (it's
> copy'n'pasted).  I'll probably be in linux-next tomorrow in any case,
> but any mistake here can be fixed.

This doesn't look quite right to me, but unfortunately I'm going be spending
most (all?) of today trying to catch a flight out of the UK. Hopefully Dave
or Ben can investigate further, but comments below.

> diff --cc arch/arm/kernel/head.S
> index 54547947a4e9,a047acfa6b6d..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/head.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/head.S
> @@@ -602,28 -586,26 +606,39 @@@ __fixup_a_pv_table
>         b       2f
>   1:    add     r7, r3
>         ldrh    ip, [r7, #2]
> + ARM_BE8(rev16 ip, ip)
>  -      and     ip, 0x8f00
>  -      orr     ip, r6  @ mask in offset bits 31-24
>  +      tst     ip, #0x4000
>  +      and     ip, #0x8f00
>  +      orrne   ip, r6  @ mask in offset bits 31-24
>  +      orreq   ip, r0  @ mask in offset bits 7-0
> + ARM_BE8(rev16 ip, ip)
>         strh    ip, [r7, #2]
>  +      ldrheq  ip, [r7]
>  +      biceq   ip, #0x20
>  +      orreq   ip, ip, r0, lsr #16
>  +      strheq  ip, [r7]

There are new halfword accesses here without any conditional revs.

>   2:    cmp     r4, r5
>         ldrcc   r7, [r4], #4    @ use branch for delay slot
>         bcc     1b
>         bx      lr
>   #else
>  +      moveq   r0, #0x400000   @ set bit 22, mov to mvn instruction
>         b       2f
>   1:    ldr     ip, [r7, r3]
> + #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_ENDIAN_BE8
> +       @ in BE8, we load data in BE, but instructions still in LE
> +       bic     ip, ip, #0xff000000
>  -      orr     ip, ip, r6, lsl#24
> ++      tst     ip, #0x000f0000 @ check the rotation field

Since that orr with shift has been removed, I think the masks for the BE
case are now incorrect...

> ++      orrne   ip, ip, r6, lsl #24 @ mask in offset bits 31-24
> ++      biceq   ip, ip, #0x00004000 @ clear bit 22
> ++      orreq   ip, ip, r0, lsl #24 @ mask in offset bits 7-0
> + #else
>         bic     ip, ip, #0x000000ff
>  -      orr     ip, ip, r6      @ mask in offset bits 31-24
>  +      tst     ip, #0xf00      @ check the rotation field
>  +      orrne   ip, ip, r6      @ mask in offset bits 31-24
>  +      biceq   ip, ip, #0x400000       @ clear bit 22

...which seems to be confirmed by the updated LE code (everything is off
by a byte).

Somebody should probably sit down with the conflicting patch and port the BE
changes over. I think the relevant patch is "ARM: mm: Correct virt_to_phys
patching for 64 bit physical addresses". In fact, looking at *that* patch,
it's *also* broken for BE! It adds the following to head.S:

+#ifdef __ARMEB_
+#define LOW_OFFSET     0x4
+#define HIGH_OFFSET    0x0
+#else
+#define LOW_OFFSET     0x0
+#define HIGH_OFFSET    0x4
+#endif

(spot the missing underscore).

So I guess that means somebody should test whatever the resulting merge
ends up being too...

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-28  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-18 20:54 [PULL REQ] Big Endian initial patch series Ben Dooks
2013-10-19 17:09 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-19 19:51   ` Ben Dooks
2013-10-28  0:47     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-28  8:44       ` Will Deacon [this message]
2013-10-28  8:53         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-28  9:12           ` Sricharan R
2013-10-29  5:09             ` Victor Kamensky
2013-10-29  5:24               ` Sricharan R
2013-10-28 15:59           ` Ben Dooks
2013-10-30  4:05             ` Victor Kamensky
2013-10-30 17:43               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-30 18:01             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-30 18:23               ` Victor Kamensky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131028084455.GA20218@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).