linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: imx6: fix imprecise abort handler
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:55:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201310301555.02807.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo5NHXXZPm5wj05DSD94KkzEUkefceHPC_Zup+-APUYdKQ@mail.gmail.com>

Dear Bjorn Helgaas,

> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Pratyush Anand
> 
> <pratyush.anand@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> >> Dear Tim Harvey,
> >> 
> >> > An imprecise abort is triggered when a port behind a switch is
> >> > accessed and no device is present.  At enumeration, imprecise aborts
> >> > are not enabled
> > 
> > I do not know the complete history. But I do not understand, why
> > imprecise aborts are not enabled during kernel enumeration.
> > What happens when PCIe switch is already connected before boot?
> > pci_common_init will try to read vendor/product ID for a non-existing
> > function during kernel enumeration itself, which should result in
> > imprecise external abort. In fact, I had observed with my system that if
> > a switch is connected to PCIe RC, then abort occurs during kernel
> > initialization itself. So a proper handling was needed. We called
> > hook_fault_code from
> > a subsys_init pcie_init (or similar) function, which insured that abort
> > handler is called whenever, software tries to read vendor/product id of
> > a non-existing function
> > 
> >> > thus this ends up getting deferred until the kernel has completed
> >> > init. At
> >> > that point we must not adjust PC - the handler must do nothing, but a
> >> > handler must exist.
> >> > 
> >> > This fixes random crashes that occur right after freeing init.
> >> > This is against linux-pci/host-imx6.
> >> > 
> >> > Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> >> > Tested-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>
> >> 
> >> Expanding CC a bit, let's have more eyes on this.
> >> 
> >> > ---
> >> > 
> >> >  drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c |    6 ------
> >> >  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> >> > 
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
> >> > index 966bac6..90fce05 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
> >> > @@ -200,12 +200,6 @@ static int pcie_phy_write(void __iomem *dbi_base,
> >> > int
> >> > addr, int data) static int imx6q_pcie_abort_handler(unsigned long
> >> > addr,
> >> > 
> >> >               unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs)
> >> >  
> >> >  {
> >> > 
> >> > -     /*
> >> > -      * If it was an imprecise abort, then we need to correct the
> >> > -      * return address to be _after_ the instruction.
> >> > -      */
> >> > -     if (fsr & (1 << 10))
> >> > -             regs->ARM_pc += 4;
> > 
> > Just for knowledge, is there any case other than read of IDs which might
> > cause imprecise abort? If not, then this handler can be modified a bit to
> > insure
> > that it does not handle any unintended imprecise abort.
> > 
> > Regards
> > Pratyush
> > 
> >> >       return 0;
> >> >  
> >> >  }
> 
> I'm sort of dubious about imx6q_pcie_abort_handler() to begin with --
> it seems like it assumes that imprecise aborts are either enabled or
> disabled.  Isn't there some way it can *check* whether that's the
> case, so it won't break if those aborts are enabled at a different
> point in the future?

The best way here would be to find a way to prevent the DWC controller from 
generating data abort on missing device _at_all_ and just make the read from 
that portion of config space be 0xffffffff or zeroes . I didn't find any 
configuration bit that would be able to do it though :( Richard, can you maybe 
check with FSL if such an option exists on the controller?

> For now, I'll apply this to my pci/host-imx6 branch for v3.13, but let
> me know if you want to tweak it somehow.
> 
> Bjorn

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-30 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1382056042-7299-1-git-send-email-tharvey@gateworks.com>
2013-10-19  1:33 ` [PATCH] PCI: imx6: fix imprecise abort handler Marek Vasut
2013-10-21  0:56   ` Shawn Guo
     [not found]   ` <CAHM4w1nyXCuTya+TR7Rxiw0ojmwZHwz9iUmz=cG8z_8h2wKhSw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-10-29 19:46     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-10-30 14:55       ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2013-11-01  3:31         ` Richard Zhu
2013-11-01 12:18           ` Marek Vasut

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201310301555.02807.marex@denx.de \
    --to=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).