From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:20:07 +0000
Subject: acked
In-Reply-To: <20131030171544.GF26784@titan.lakedaemon.net>
References: <1383152110-19577-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
 <1383152110-19577-2-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
 <52713B10.9060809@free-electrons.com>
 <20131030171544.GF26784@titan.lakedaemon.net>
Message-ID: <20131030172007.GI16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 01:15:44PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
> Gregory,
> 
> I like the idea, and if you perhaps do '[PATCH X/Y] Acked' it should
> make it through the filters.  (they currently whitelist 'GIT PULL' and
> 'PATCH' subjects).
> 
> Sure would make things easier when going through the threads...

NAK. :)

The reason being that some mailing list archivers will break threads
with a subject line change, which will detach the "acked" from the
original messages.

If a patch made it though with "[PATCH" in the subject line, then a
reply (though *correctly* trimmed down as per Internet Etiquette
which is something people - including yourself as evidenced by the
message to which I'm replying - regularly don't do) will get through
without any issues.