From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jason@lakedaemon.net (Jason Cooper)
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:27:33 -0400
Subject: acked
In-Reply-To: <52714040.4040308@free-electrons.com>
References: <1383152110-19577-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
 <1383152110-19577-2-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
 <52713B10.9060809@free-electrons.com>
 <20131030171544.GF26784@titan.lakedaemon.net>
 <52714040.4040308@free-electrons.com>
Message-ID: <20131030172732.GH26784@titan.lakedaemon.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 06:22:08PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> 
> On 30/10/2013 18:15, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > Gregory,
> > 
> > I like the idea, and if you perhaps do '[PATCH X/Y] Acked' it should
> > make it through the filters.  (they currently whitelist 'GIT PULL' and
> > 'PATCH' subjects).
> > 
> 
> Well actually it was a mistake! I ended to use a plugin to automatically
> writing some pattern instead of writing it myself each time, but I
> mis-configured it!

yeah, saw that on irc after I hit send.

> I am not sure that everybody like the idea to hijack the subject of a thread,
> but if there a agreement on it, now I know hot to do it! ;)

No, rmk has a very valid point.  It would break most ml archiving.  We
don't want to do that.

thx,

Jason.