From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [BUG?] ARM: mvebu: is second PCIe unit of Armada XP mv78230 x1 or x4?
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 15:57:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131106155705.444c20b2@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131105104845.4fc9e216@skate>
Arnaud,
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 10:48:45 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> The only place where we (Gregory pointed me in the right direction)
> could find some relation between the SoC variants and the available PCIe
> interfaces is in the hardware manual of each SoC variant, where the
> SERDES lanes are described.
>
> For MV78230, it says:
>
> PCIe 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2
[...]
> What it says for 78230 it a bit weird, because I don't see why it
> mentions 1.1 and 1.2 since the second PCIe interface on 78230 is said
> to be x1. Maybe that's a mistake in the datasheet, I'll try to get a
> confirmation about this.
I've updated the MV78230 hardware datasheet that we had, and indeed the
latest version available has this correct: MV78230 has PCIe 0.0, 0.1,
0.2, 0.3 and 1.0, which means a x4/x1 PCIe interface and a x1 one. The
"1.1" and "1.2" indicated in an earlier version of the datasheet were a
mistake, apparently.
Bottom line: it means that the patch you submitted and that I Acked-by
a few minutes ago is correct.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-06 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-04 18:00 [BUG?] ARM: mvebu: is second PCIe unit of Armada XP mv78230 x1 or x4? Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-05 8:36 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-11-05 9:48 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-06 14:57 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131106155705.444c20b2@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).