linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clk: add flags to distinguish xtal clocks
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:37:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131110113716.GN26440@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383933648-28595-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com>

Hi Felipe,

On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 12:00:48PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> From: Luciano Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>
> 
> Add a flag that indicate whether the clock is a crystal or not.
> 
> Additionally, parse a new device tree binding in clk-fixed-rate to set
> this flag.
> 
> If clock-xtal isn't set, the clock framework will assume clock to be
> generated by an oscillator.  There's only one user for this binding
> right now which is Texas Instruments' WiLink devices which need to know
> details about the clock in order to initialize the underlying WiFi HW
> correctly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> ---
> 
> Dropped CLK_IS_TYPE_DEFINED flag and just assume that if the flag
> isn't there, default behavior will be taken.
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/fixed-clock.txt | 1 +
>  drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c                            | 6 +++++-
>  include/linux/clk-provider.h                            | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/fixed-clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/fixed-clock.txt
> index 0b1fe78..3036dfe 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/fixed-clock.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/fixed-clock.txt
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ Required properties:
>  Optional properties:
>  - gpios : From common gpio binding; gpio connection to clock enable pin.
>  - clock-output-names : From common clock binding.
> +- clock-xtal: true when a clock is provided by a crystal
>  
>  Example:
>  	clock {
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c
> index 1ed591a..5db9bf0 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c
> @@ -91,13 +91,17 @@ void of_fixed_clk_setup(struct device_node *node)
>  	struct clk *clk;
>  	const char *clk_name = node->name;
>  	u32 rate;
> +	unsigned long flags = CLK_IS_ROOT;
>  
>  	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "clock-frequency", &rate))
>  		return;
>  
> +	if (of_property_read_bool(node, "clock-xtal"))
> +		flags |= CLK_IS_TYPE_XTAL;
> +

Introducing a new compatible instead of a property would make more
sense here I think.

Do you have a reason not to do so?

Thanks,
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20131110/85679620/attachment.sig>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-10 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-04 21:05 [RFC] clk: add flags to distinguish xtal clocks Luciano Coelho
2013-07-04 22:25 ` Mike Turquette
2013-07-04 22:37   ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-04 23:19     ` Mike Turquette
2013-07-05  7:54       ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-29 13:50         ` Luciano Coelho
2013-10-07  7:44           ` Mike Turquette
2013-10-08 15:27             ` Felipe Balbi
2013-10-16 10:24               ` Luca Coelho
2013-10-23  9:24                 ` Mike Turquette
2013-10-23 11:35                   ` Luca Coelho
2013-11-08 18:00                     ` [PATCH] " Felipe Balbi
2013-11-08 19:16                       ` Luca Coelho
2013-11-10 11:37                       ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2013-11-11 19:42                         ` Felipe Balbi
2013-11-11 19:50                           ` Luca Coelho
2013-11-11 20:59                             ` Maxime Ripard
2013-11-12  8:05                               ` Luca Coelho
2013-11-13 14:40                                 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-11-11 20:54                           ` Maxime Ripard
2013-11-11 16:27                       ` Stephen Warren
2013-11-11 19:43                         ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-05 13:12 ` [RFC] " James Hogan
2013-07-05 13:21   ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-05 13:22   ` Luciano Coelho

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131110113716.GN26440@lukather \
    --to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).