From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:39:04 +0000 Subject: Physical memory start contraints in the Linux kernel (Was: Re: Xen osstest on Calxeda midway progress (Was: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 21486: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED)) In-Reply-To: <5282483E.1000101@monstr.eu> References: <1383731526.26213.25.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <1383736784.26213.72.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <1383822868.26213.181.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <1384250005.1883.35.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <20131112132001.GJ16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <5282483E.1000101@monstr.eu> Message-ID: <20131112153904.GP16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 04:24:46PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > On 11/12/2013 02:20 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c > > index f52150d2ec00..1957d54198ad 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c > > @@ -660,6 +660,17 @@ int __init arm_add_memory(u64 start, u64 size) > > } > > #endif > > > > + if (aligned_start < PHYS_OFFSET) { > > + if (aligned_start + size < PHYS_OFFSET) { > > just a note I sent to Russell. Here should be "<=" instead of just "<" > > > + pr_info("Ignoring memory below PHYS_OFFSET: 0x%08llx-0x%08llx\n", > > + aligned_start, aligned_start + size); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + size -= PHYS_OFFSET - aligned_start; > > + aligned_start = PHYS_OFFSET; > > We should printk a message here to be aware that alignment was done. Yep, you sent me an updated patch, I haven't added anything to my kernel tree for about a week and a bit now as I want to get what's already there into Linus' tree. Once that stuff has gone, I'll see about adding some of these fixes we need into the queue.