public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: eric@eukrea.com (Eric Bénard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 1/8] drm: Add the lacking DRM_MODE_FLAG_* for matching the DISPLAY_FLAGS_*
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 08:53:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131113085318.394991f3@e6520eb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131112170455.GQ16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

Hi Russell,

Le Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:04:55 +0000,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> a ?crit :
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:49:18PM +0100, Denis Carikli wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> > index fc2adb6..586c12f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> > @@ -537,6 +537,15 @@ int drm_display_mode_from_videomode(const struct videomode *vm,
> >  		dmode->flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLSCAN;
> >  	if (vm->flags & DISPLAY_FLAGS_DOUBLECLK)
> >  		dmode->flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLCLK;
> > +	if (vm->flags & DISPLAY_FLAGS_DE_LOW)
> > +		dmode->flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_DE_LOW;
> > +	if (vm->flags & DISPLAY_FLAGS_DE_HIGH)
> > +		dmode->flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_DE_HIGH;
> > +	if (vm->flags & DISPLAY_FLAGS_PIXDATA_POSEDGE)
> > +		dmode->flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIXDATA_POSEDGE;
> > +	if (vm->flags & DISPLAY_FLAGS_PIXDATA_NEGEDGE)
> > +		dmode->flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIXDATA_NEGEDGE;
> > +
> 
> I'm still not convinced that these should be exposed in *any* way to
> userspace - I'm with Ville Syrj?l? on this point.
> 
> Yes, you've moved their definition out of a uapi header file, but
> they're still leaking out of kernel space via calls (and with Xorg,
> they'll leak into the DisplayMode structures within the X server.)
> 
> Now, here's the thing... The polarity of the display enable signal.
> That's a property of the connected device right?  It doesn't change
> with respect to the displayed mode unlike the hsync/vsync signals.
> If that's true, it should not be here.
> 
> Same goes for the pixel clock edge.  If it's a property of the
> connected device and doesn't have a dependence on the displayed
> mode, then it should not be in the DRM mode structure.

What would be the right way to configure these settings without
exposing them to userspace ?

As explained in my answer to Fabio, these settings are currently
hardcoded into ipuv3-crtc and we need to configure them to support more
TFT panels using the IPUV3 Parallel Display Interface.

Thanks
Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-13  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-12 16:49 [PATCHv3 1/8] drm: Add the lacking DRM_MODE_FLAG_* for matching the DISPLAY_FLAGS_* Denis Carikli
2013-11-12 16:49 ` [PATCHv3 2/8] [media] v4l2: add new V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB666 pixel format Denis Carikli
2013-11-13  2:47   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-11-12 16:49 ` [PATCHv3 3/8] staging: imx-drm: ipuv3-crtc: don't harcode some mode flags Denis Carikli
2013-11-13  3:52   ` Fabio Estevam
2013-11-13  7:50     ` Eric Bénard
2013-11-12 16:49 ` [PATCHv3 4/8] staging: imx-drm: Add RGB666 support for parallel display Denis Carikli
2013-11-12 17:04 ` [PATCHv3 1/8] drm: Add the lacking DRM_MODE_FLAG_* for matching the DISPLAY_FLAGS_* Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-13  7:53   ` Eric Bénard [this message]
2013-11-13  9:05     ` Philipp Zabel
2013-11-13  9:41     ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131113085318.394991f3@e6520eb \
    --to=eric@eukrea.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox